Cases 31 - 40 of 587
MARTINEZ v. CREANY
as 2:2023cv01407
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JUDGE TIMOTHY CREANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTINEZ v. LENIHAN
as 2:2023cv01405
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JUDGE LISA PUPO LENIHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRUZ v. GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2023cv03072
Plaintiff:
ANGELICA M CRUZ
Defendant:
GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CRUZ v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. et al
as 5:2023cv02439
Plaintiff:
MARIA CRUZ
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. doing business as THE HOME DEPOT and THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
GOODE v. ZALESKI et al
as 2:2023cv02506
Plaintiff:
RONALD GOODE
Defendant:
THOMAS M. ZALESKI, WILLIAM J. KNECHT, SHIVA RAJA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINEZ v. CREANY
as 2:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JUDGE TIMOTHY CREANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRUZ v. MONTILLA
as 5:2023cv02726
Plaintiff:
ANGELICA M CRUZ
Defendant:
JUAN J MONTILLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
ADAMS v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2023cv02142
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. ADAMS, JR.
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, SUPERINTENDENT METELLUS, KELLY REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODE v. WERNER et al
as 2:2023cv02109
Plaintiff:
RONALD GOODE
Defendant:
BRIAN WERNER, THOMAS ROLA, JR, P/O NELL J CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
