Cases 31 - 40 of 183
Diaz v. Hames et al
as 4:2022cv00134
Petitioner:
Nadya Ivette Diaz
Respondent:
Adam Hames, Matthew Kyle Winchester, United States District Court ND GA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2022cv02221
Petitioner:
Camilo Diaz, Jr.
Respondent:
Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Diaz v. Fikes
as 2:2022cv00051
Petitioner:
Luis A. Diaz
Respondent:
Warden Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramirez-Diaz v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00056
Petitioner:
Jair Eudoro Ramirez-Diaz
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Grogan et al v. Diaz et al
as 3:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Tyler Grogan and Tommy Mims
Defendant:
Luz Diaz, Devin Nuckles, Veronica Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Ward et al
as 1:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Diaz
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Trevonza Bobbitt, Valderine Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gomez v. Diaz et al
as 2:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Adam Gomez
Defendant:
Delvis Joel Diaz, Arel Trucking Inc. and Prime Property & Casualty Insurance Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Munoz v. Diaz
as 4:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Isai Ponce Munoz
Defendant:
Blanca Estela Buenrostro Diaz
Not Classified By Court:
Julia Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 Int'l Child Abduction Remedies Act (Hague Conventn)
Brady et al v. Diaz
as 1:2021cv04864
Plaintiff:
Adam Brady and Emma Brady
Defendant:
Anel Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
