Cases 31 - 40 of 6,258
Roudebush v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Heather A. Roudebush
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Stiles v Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY K STILES
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BRADFORD v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00271
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. BRADFORD
Respondent:
J. WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CLARK v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
JERRY W. CLARK, JR.
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MORRIS MOSS v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
DEMANZIO LAMONT MORRIS MOSS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
JEFFRIS v. VANTLIN
as 2:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
DENNIS J. JEFFRIS
Defendant:
DOUG VANTLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. ESTATE OF LAURA J. BRYANT
as 1:2024cv00940
Plaintiff:
ANITA S. BRYANT
Defendant:
ESTATE OF LAURA J. BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
NOBLE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. NOBLE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, DURREGAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
JAMES PAYNE
Respondent:
J. WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
PETERON v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
CAMERONS PETERON
Defendant:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN, FLOWER'S DORM REP, CO'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
