Cases 31 - 40 of 771
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv01345
Plaintiff:
Andy Ortiz
Defendant:
BM. Zborovancik, John Doe, Dan Caro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPADY v. ROSS STORES, INC.
as 2:2023cv03010
Plaintiff:
Rashiek Spady
Defendant:
ROSS STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Tunsil v. Laurel et al
as 1:2023cv01288
Plaintiff:
Barrett S. Tunsil
Defendant:
Harry Laurel, WellPath, Inc, Pennsylvania Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ROSS v. COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC et al
as 2:2023cv02435
Plaintiff:
DENNIS ROSS
Defendant:
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC and CHSPSC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Graziano v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2023cv00947
Plaintiff:
Edward Graziano
Defendant:
John Wetzel, George Little, Laurel R. Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HELMS v. HAYES et al
as 2:2023cv02192
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DALE HELMS, SR.
Defendant:
WILLIAM HAYES, XAVIER BRIEDENSTIEN, LIEUTENANT AGLAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv02162
Plaintiff:
MALIK SALEM BEY
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, GLENN M. ROSS, ANDREW FELTZIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IQBAL v. BPOA, PA STATE BOARD OF MEDICINE et al
as 2:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
ZAFAR IQBAL
Defendant:
BPOA, PA STATE BOARD OF MEDICINE, DONALD J. COKUS, JR., CURAHEALTH PITTSBURGH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
