Cases 31 - 40 of 87
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
ROWE v. SCISM et al
as 1:2019cv05060
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL DIRECTOR, CIF and J. SCISM
Plaintiff:
LESTER ROWE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv03320
Plaintiff:
SHERRY ROWE
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROWE v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2018cv02673
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, PAUL A. TALBOT, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY ROWE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWE v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 1:2018cv01269
Plaintiff:
MARCIA ROWE
Defendant:
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
ROWE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv04268
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
317) 237-1000 (fax:
John T. Schlafer, John T. Schlafer and John T. Schlafer
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROWE v. DILLOW et al
as 1:2017cv03288
Defendant:
BROWN, BURKHARDT, ALICIA D. COOMER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALLEN ROWE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROWE v. LAGENOUR et al
as 1:2017cv02882
Defendant:
LAURA BODKINS, ROY BUCKNER, CAMAY FRANCUM and others
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
LARRY ROWE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDS v. BROWN et al
as 2:2017cv00264
Defendant:
ATHEY, RICHARD BROWN, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY R. RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
