Cases 31 - 40 of 1,664
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00025
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Crystal Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00406
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Locklear v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority et al
as 7:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Locklear
Defendant:
Tamala Gillespie, Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority and A.J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00384
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sayers v. Bateman et al
as 2:2024cv00373
Defendant:
Lewis Thomas Bateman and Steven M. Smith
Plaintiff:
Brooke Ashley Sayers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Thompson v. Smith
as 2:2024cv00378
Respondent:
Nelson Smith
Petitioner:
Lawrence E. Thompson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Owens et al
as 7:2024cv00373
Defendant:
R. Owens, Z. Farmer, B. Dotson and others
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Targonsk et al
as 2:2024cv00363
Defendant:
J.D. Oath, Targonsk, K. Silvas and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Smith et al
as 7:2024cv00356
Defendant:
Jeffrey Dillman, P. Sykes, Happy Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Leroy Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonard v. Smith
as 3:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Patricia D Leonard
Defendant:
Cameron D Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
