Cases 31 - 40 of 409
Jidoefor v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 0:2022cv01777
Plaintiff:
Okwuchukwu Jideofor and Okwuchukwu Jidoefor
Defendant:
County of Sherburne, The, MEND Correctional Care LLC, Wendy Zitzloff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv01590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lundmark v. Beltrami County et al
as 0:2022cv01493
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Lundmark
Defendant:
Beltrami County, Clearwater County, MEnD Correctional Care, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wiedmeier v. Eischen
as 0:2022cv01391
Petitioner:
Todd Michael Wiedmeier
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McIntyre v. Sammon
as 0:2022cv01328
Plaintiff:
Todd A McIntyre and Todd A. McIntyre
Defendant:
Craig Sammon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Zwolensky v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00963
Plaintiff:
Todd Zwolensky
Defendant:
3M Company, 3M Occupational Safety, LLC, Aearo Holding, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Croaston v. Aearo Technologies, LLC et al
as 0:2022cv00912
Plaintiff:
Todd Croaston
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC, 3M Company, 3M Occupational Safety, LLC and others
Mccauley v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00550
Plaintiff:
Todd Mccauley
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Riddle v. Sherburne County et al
as 0:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Riddle
Defendant:
Sherburne County, Sherburne County Jail, Joel Brott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
