Cases 31 - 40 of 453
Hower v. Dr. Scott et al
as 2:2022cv04098
Plaintiff:
Skylar A Hower and Skyler A Hower
Defendant:
Dr. Scott, Dr. Jane Doe, Bales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. DiPasquale Moore Company et al
as 4:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Herman Hampton, Sr.
Defendant:
DiPasquale Moore Company, Ivan Cameto and Todd Lucas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Weems v. Kahl
as 4:2022cv00456
Petitioner:
Todd L. Weems
Respondent:
Shawn Kahl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Koch et al v. Taylor et al
as 4:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
Michele Koch and Kendal Koch
Defendant:
Kayla Taylor, Steven Meyers, Lauren Goddard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Saling v. Barnes et al
as 4:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Phillip Saling
Defendant:
Steven Pelton, Scott Duck, Michael Delatorre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Presson v. USA
as 6:2022cv03078
Petitioner:
Tracy Todd Presson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Morgan v. Francis et al
as 2:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Raichelle Morgan
Defendant:
Todd Francis, Angela Mesmer, Marilyn Buss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Missouri Department of Mental Health et al
as 4:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Everett Henderson
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Mental Health, Douglass McCoy, Davinder Hayreh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rey et al v. Kyne et al
as 2:2022cv04036
Plaintiff:
Justin Todd Rey and Sydney Walters
Defendant:
James Kyne, Stacey Reynolds, Katie Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
