Cases 31 - 40 of 56
United States of America v. Ahmad et al
as 3:2016cv00096
Defendant:
Munir Ahmad and Kathleen Ahmad
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Ahmad et al
as 3:2013cv02404
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Munir Ahmad and Kathleen Ahmad
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Roufail v. SNS Cleveland LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01849
Plaintiff:
Sewar Roufail
Defendant:
SNS Cleveland LLC, Nizar Zein and Ahmad Ascha
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
United States of America v. $525,695.24 et al
as 1:2013cv01455
Defendant:
$21,480.00, $132,078.89, Real Property Located at 18283 Glen Carin Way, Strongsville, Ohio and others
Claimant:
Sbeih A. Sbeih and Nimeh Ahmad-Sbeih
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Bush v. Ahmad et al
as 1:2013cv00448
Plaintiff:
Willie James Bush, Jr.
Defendant:
Yousuf Ahmad and U.S. Clerk of Court in Cincinnati, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bishawi v. NEOCC et al
as 4:2012cv03106
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Bishawi
Defendant:
NEOCC, CCA Corrections Corporation of America, Roddie Rushing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bishawi v. Pugh
as 4:2012cv02377
Petitioner:
Ahmad Bishawi
Respondent:
Warden Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ahmad et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20171
Plaintiff:
Nasreen Ahmad and Malik Ahmad
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wani et al v. MI Windows and Doors, Inc.
as 2:2011cv01086
Plaintiff:
Manzoor Ahmad Wani and Sozi Wani
Defendant:
MI Windows and Doors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Embroidery Technology USA LLC v. Albanna
as 1:2011cv02165
Plaintiff:
Embroidery Technology USA LLC
Defendant:
Ahmad Albanna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
