Cases 31 - 40 of 109
Lamberson v. Wytheville Police Department et al
as 3:2018cv00677
Defendant:
Board of Supervisors of Wythe County, Virginia, Gerald E. Mabe, II, Scot S. Farthing and others
Plaintiff:
David Allen Lamberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Yahweh v. Clarke et al
as 1:2018cv01076
Defendant:
Ms. Ansah, Foe Two, Dr. Woodrow A. Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Yeshua Emanuel Yahweh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Clarke
as 2:2018cv00206
Petitioner:
Kevin Arnold Lewis
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. New Prime, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00861
Plaintiff:
Arnold E. Brown
Defendant:
New Prime, Inc. , Prime Inc. and Caleb M. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jehovah v. Clarke et al
as 1:2017cv01307
Plaintiff:
Jesus Emmanuel Jehovah
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, John M. Jabe, Arnold David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Truth Technologies, Inc. v. Arnold et al
as 1:2017cv00833
Plaintiff:
Truth Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Jonathan Arnold , James Hughes , Patrick Brannen and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Prasad v. Federal Trade Commission et al
as 3:2017cv00224
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Defendant:
Federal Trade Commission, Richard Locke, Stephen Bloomquest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prasad v. Cheek et al
as 3:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Defendant:
Viviene B. Cheek, Vivian B. Cheek, Carolyn D. Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prasad v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 3:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Sundari Karma Prasad
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, Carolyn D. Nelson, Viviene B. Cheek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prasad et al v. Ellis et al
as 3:2016cv01005
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad and Sheamus D.A. Nelson-Prasad II
Defendant:
Ellis, Carolyn D. Nelson, Viviene B. Creek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
