Cases 31 - 40 of 3,092
Gould v. Alabama, State of
as 2:2023cv00860
Petitioner:
Roland Andra Gould
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Oliver et al
as 3:2023cv00752
Petitioner:
Thomas Martin, Jr
Respondent:
Shannon Oliver and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carr v. Davis et al
as 6:2023cv00744
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Carr
Respondent:
Gwendolyn Davis, Steve Marshall and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dawson v. Russell County Department of Human Resources et al (MAG+)
as 3:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
Megan Dawson and Megan E. Dawson
Defendant:
Russell County Department of Human Resources, Alabama Attorney General Office, Greg Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Crabtree et al
as 5:2023cv00697
Petitioner:
Ronald King
Respondent:
Warden Crabtree and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horsman v. Edwards et al
as 5:2023cv00601
Petitioner:
William Wiles Horsman, III
Respondent:
George Edwards and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mahaffey v. Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
as 5:2023cv00584
Petitioner:
Corey Ryan Mahaffey
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barber v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
Beverly Owen Barber
Defendant:
Danny Mitchell doing business as Mitchell's Paradise Campground, Steve Marshall, Attorney General State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Emrit v. Florida Department of Law Enforcement et al
as 2:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Broward County State Attorney's Office, City of Fort Lauderdale Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
