Cases 31 - 40 of 593
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Kahoul v. Grant et al
as 5:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Adam Benallel and Lina Kahoul
Defendant:
Kaitlyn Grant and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Hall v. Truner et al
as 5:2023ct03338
Plaintiff:
Adam Wade Hall
Defendant:
Sgt. Truner and DAC of Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bulluck v. USA
as 5:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Adam Christopher Bulluck
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WILLIAMS et al v. HALL et al
as 1:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
SHAUNA WILLIAMS, FLOR HERRERA-PICASSO, MINERVA FREEMAN and others
Defendant:
DESTIN HALL, WARREN DANIEL, RALPH E. HISE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ADAMS v. DIVI HOTELS MARKETING, INC et al
as 1:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
SUSAN ADAMS
Defendant:
Divi Hotels Marketing, Inc, DR Directors, Inc., Divi St. Maarten Holding, N.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ford v. Stone et al
as 5:2024ct03001
Plaintiff:
Jarred J. Ford
Defendant:
Keith Stone, Sheriff Bond Surety, Major Allen Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Randolph v. USA
as 3:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Adam Lawrence Randolph, IV
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Johnson v. Cooper et al
as 5:2023ct03322
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
Governor Roy Cooper, Todd E. Ishee, Stephen Waddell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
