Cases 31 - 40 of 98
In re: Subpoena Duces Tecum to Verizon Wireless
as 8:2019cv02122
Plaintiff:
Paul Mack, Danita Ingram, Thomas Boone and others
Petitioner:
Hector Velez
Defendant:
Prince George's County Maryland, et al., Mark A. Magaw, Major Kathleen Mills and others
In re: Subpoena Duces Tecum to Verizon Wireless
as 8:2019cv02123
Plaintiff:
Paul Mack, Danita Ingram, Thomas Boone and others
Defendant:
Prince George's County Maryland, et al., Mark A. Magaw, Kathleen Mills and others
Petitioner:
Melvin Powell
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02275
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02014
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv03927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lee et al v. Teaf
as 1:2018cv03115
Plaintiff:
Unnamed Trust for Certain Maryland Property, The Louise S. Leaf Revocable Trust, Erin R Lee and others
Defendant:
Adrian R Teaf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Petrus v. Kuhlman et al
as 1:2018cv01429
Plaintiff:
Adrian Petrus
Defendant:
Bruce Kuhlman and KR Contracting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vinson v. USA-2255
as 8:2018cv01407
Petitioner:
Adrian Vinson
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Duncan v. Prince George's County et al
as 8:2018cv01378
Plaintiff:
Adrian Terrell Duncan
Defendant:
Prince George's County , Mary Lou McDonough , Jeter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baldwin et al v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv03781
Defendant:
The United States of America, United States Postal Service and Alton Hawkins, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Adriane Baldwin and K.B.M.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
