Cases 31 - 40 of 105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00161
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Aeritas, LLC v. Air Canada
as 6:2020cv00061
Defendant:
Air Canada
Plaintiff:
Aeritas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Trid et al v. Air Canada
as 1:2019cv06276
Plaintiff:
Olena Guz, Vladen Faynerman and Iryna Trid
Defendant:
Primeflight Aviation Services, Inc. d/b/a Primeflight of DE, Primeflight Aviation Service, Inc. and Air Canada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
AGCS Marine Insurance Company et al v. Nippon Express USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05874
Defendant:
Air Canada and Nippon Express USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
AGCS Marine Insurance Company, BSC International Medical Trading (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. and Boston Scientific Corporation
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Nippon Express U.S.A., Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Roes 1 through 10, inclusive
Nagel v. Hilton et al
as 1:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Legal/Compliance Manager Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rusak et al v. Air Canada et al
as 1:2018cv08379
Plaintiff:
Zorina Bukowski, Vasyl Rusak, Lilia Knobel and others
Defendant:
Air Canada and UKRAINE INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (UIA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
v. AIR CANADA
as 2:2018cv14820
Defendant:
AIR CANADA
Plaintiff:
Paula Pinderhughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
PINDERHUGHES v. AIR CANADA et al
as 3:2018cv14820
Defendant:
ABC CO's (1-10), UNITED VACATIONS, MARK TRAVEL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
PAULA PINDERHUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Dukes v. Air Canada
as 8:2018cv02176
Defendant:
Air Canada
Plaintiff:
Mary Dukes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01057
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
