Cases 31 - 40 of 1,306
TAYLOR v. HALLER
as 2:2023cv01955
Plaintiff:
ASHLEIGH M. TAYLOR
Defendant:
ALEXANDER TOY HALLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
BELFI v. WAGNER et al
as 2:2023cv04346
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER BELFI
Defendant:
THOMAS WAGNER, MARSHALL DENNHEY, PC, MELANIE FOREMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
WASHINGTON v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN and MAJOR J. ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
BREHM v. JOHNSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 3:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER SHANE BREHM
Defendant:
JOHNSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT, DETECTIVE BRADLEY CRIST, THE CITY OF JOHNSTOWN OF PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALEXANDER v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL
as 2:2023cv03521
Plaintiff:
LIAM ALEXANDER
Defendant:
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. HONORABLE DAVID ACKER et al
as 2:2023cv01489
Petitioner:
ASHLEIGH M. TAYLOR
Respondent:
HONORABLE DAVID ACKER and ALEXANDER ROY HALLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEJESUS JR. et al v. SANTIAGO et al
as 2:2023cv03424
Plaintiff:
ANGEL L. DEJESUS JR. and CAROLINE MORALES
Defendant:
LOUIS SANTIAGO, MATTHEW KARNISH, ALEXANDER BOEHM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEJESUS JR. et al v. SANTIAGO et al
as 5:2023cv03424
Plaintiff:
ANGEL L. DEJESUS JR. and CAROLINE MORALES
Defendant:
LOUIS SANTIAGO, MATTHEW KARNISH, ALEXANDER BOEHM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
