Cases 31 - 40 of 4,862
Ramirez-Rincon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2907
Petitioner:
MONICA RAMIREZ-RINCON and NICOLAS ALEXIS ORTEGA-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Alexis Perez
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rangel v. Giannoulias et al
as 1:2024cv03649
Plaintiff:
Adrian G. Rangel
Defendant:
Alexi Giannoulias, Toyeal S. Rice and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Slaten v. Christian Dior Perfumes LLC
as 24-2825
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS SLATEN, an individual, on behalf of herself, the general public, and those similarly situated
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN DIOR PERFUMES LLC
Hill v. House of Cheatham LLC, et al
as 1:2024cv03539
Plaintiff:
Alexis Hill
Defendant:
HOUSE OF CHEATHAM, LLC, LOreal USA Inc., LOreal USA Products Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ackerman et al v. Arkema Inc.
as 4:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ackerman, Mary Ackerman, Sylbestre Aburto and others
Defendant:
Arkema Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Rodas Villatoro v. Garland
as 24-1136
Petitioner:
MARITZA ISAMAR RODAS VILLATORO, ALEXIS JOSIMAR VILLATORO RODAS and DAMARIS LISBETH VILLATORO RODAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ayala-Rodriguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2699
Petitioner:
JESUS ALBERTO AYALA-RODRIGUEZ, INGRID ARELY LAINEZ-DE AYALA, ALEXI ARNOLDO AYALA-LAINEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jermaine McAdory v. Alexis Limon, et al
as 24-1703
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE MCADORY
Defendant:
ALEXIS LIMON, RANDALL WILBORN and ALFONSO GREER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
