Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Norman v. Metro Transportation Agencies et al
as 1:2011cv08882
Plaintiff:
Dawn Norman
Defendant:
Metro Transportation Agencies, Port Authority Bus Agencies, Greyhound Bus Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PREMIER PAYMENTS ONLINE, INC. v. PAYMENT SYSTEMS WORLDWIDE et al
as 2:2011cv03429
Plaintiff:
PREMIER PAYMENTS ONLINE, INC.
Defendant:
PAYMENT SYSTEMS WORLDWIDE, CENTERLINE INTERNATIONAL, LLC, AMTRACK INTERNATIONAL, S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633
Davis v. Amtrak et al
as 2:2010cv01212
Plaintiff:
Betty L. Davis
Defendant:
Amtrack and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. Amtrak et al
as 2:2010at00654
Plaintiff:
Betty L. Davis
Defendant:
Amtrack and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nathan Blaylock v. Amtrack Railroad
as 10-35094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN MARK BLAYLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
AMTRACK RAILROAD
Khan, et al v. Amtrack, et al
as 4:1991cv02649
Plaintiff:
Brenda Khan , Robert Khan, Jr. and Laura Khan
Defendant:
Amtrack , Edward E. Estate of Edward McMillon , David Haskell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
WALTERS v. BANK OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv01060
Plaintiff:
CHRIS WALTERS
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, GREYHOUND LINES INCORPORATED and AMTRACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyle v. Amtrack et al
as 1:2009cv00410
Plaintiff:
James M. Boyle
Defendant:
Amtrack, Richard Palmer, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Murphy v. Amtrack Railroad Claim Office
as 3:2008cv00805
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Defendant:
Amtrack Railroad Claim Office
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
