Cases 31 - 40 of 91
Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2019cv00470
Plaintiff:
Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company and Burberry Limited, a New York corporation
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", sedefmermer.org, Liu Hua Liang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Johnson v. Pfister et al
as 1:2018cv07873
Defendant:
Michael Melvin, C/O Jackson, Major Blackerd and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amo v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 1:2018cv07381
Petitioner:
Nana Yaw Amo
Respondent:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Amo v. Immigration Customs Enforcement
as 1:2018cv06845
Defendant:
Immigration Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff:
Nana Yaw Amo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amo v. Pulaski County Detention Center
as 3:2018cv01759
Plaintiff:
Nana Yaw Amo
Defendant:
Pulaski County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv04403
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", oakloz.com, Roni Tess and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Eckert v. Arendell et al
as 3:2018cv01149
Plaintiff:
Joseph Amos Eckert
Defendant:
Jeffrey Arendell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tepper et al v. Amos Financial, LLC
as 1:2018cv02350
Plaintiff:
James Tepper and Allison Tepper
Defendant:
Amos Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sam v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv00690
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sam
Defendant:
Roy Visor, Jr., City of Chicago, The , Amos A. A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Amos v. Lashbrook et al
as 1:2017cv07516
Petitioner:
Russell Amos, Jr.
Respondent:
Jackeline Lashbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
