Cases 31 - 40 of 1,637
Anderson v. Tiamiyu et al
as 4:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Keenan Novon Anderson
Defendant:
Lukumon Tiamiyu, Maxwell Eke and Amber Ocoha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Anderson v. Hillhouse
as 6:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Eron Demond Anderson
Respondent:
Botie Hillhouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Anderson, Sr v. USA
as 6:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Lester Earl Anderson, Sr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Anderson v. Danila
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Ronald Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Danila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Stefanov et al
as 3:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Mildred Anderson
Defendant:
Atanas Stefanov, Clockfreight, LLC d/b.a Bulltrans and Clockfreight LLC doing business as BullTrans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Linicomn v. Harris County Sheriff Office et al
as 4:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt L Linicomn
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff Office, Harris County District Attorney Office, Harris County Commissioner Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Anderson v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Samuel Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU Tulf, FNU Ranjo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Samuel Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU Tulf, FNU Ranjo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
