Cases 31 - 36 of 36
United States of America et al v. $286,179.83 Seized From Three East West Bank Accounts et al
as 2:2014cv07131
Defendant:
$286,179.83 Seized From Three East West Bank Accounts, $6,444.92 Seized From One National Financial Services LLC Brokerage Account, One 2011 Toyota Camry and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
NDV Investment Company et al v. Apex Clearing Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00923
Petitioner:
NDV Investment Company , JM Property SP Z.O.O. SP K and Jerzy Mendelka
Respondent:
Apex Clearing Corporation and Apex Clearing Corporation, as successor in interest and obligation to Pension Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Alattar v. Sano Holdings, Inc.
as 4:2014cv00266
Not Classified By Court:
Jinsun LLC
Plaintiff:
Kahled Alattar
Defendant:
Kevan Casey, Frederick Huttner, Top Gear, Inc and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Babak Daghighi
3Rd Party Defendant:
Sano Holdings, Inc., Apex Clearing Corporation and Wilson-Davis & Co.
Intervenor Defendant:
The Jonathan Camarillo
Cross Claimant:
Luxeyard, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Lamont Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Barot v. R.F. Lafferty & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00015
Plaintiff:
Navin Barot
Defendant:
R.F. Lafferty & Co., Inc., Apex Clearing Corporation, Todd Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
McCrudden v. E Trade Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv08837
Plaintiff:
Vincent Patrick McCrudden
Defendant:
E Trade Financial Corporation , TD Ameritrade , MBF Clearing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Great China Mania Holdings, Inc. et al v. CMF Investments, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01042
Plaintiff:
Great China Mania Holdings, Inc. , Huang Jian Nan , Zeng Zhi Jian and others
Defendant:
CMF Investments, Inc. , Eiger Investments, Inc., Prism Capital, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
