Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Perez et al v Solvay, S.A.
as 1:2016cv01682
Plaintiff:
Juan B Perez and Beik Y Diaz
Defendant:
Solvay, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez et al v. Black Hills Trucking, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
Miguel B. Perez and Luis Olivares Medina
Defendant:
Black Hills Trucking, Inc. and Melvin L. Nordhagen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Padilla v. Kramer et al
as 1:2015cv05862
Plaintiff:
George Padilla
Defendant:
Donald E Kramer, Patrick B. Perez, C. Hunger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Grace B. Perez v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 5:2015cv00305
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association and Kyanite Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Grace B. Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Carrasco v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 5:2015cv00300
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association and Kyanite Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Grace B. Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Kellogg v. Kane County Sheriff et al
as 1:2014cv10300
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kellogg
Defendant:
Kane County Sheriff, Patrick B. Perez, Kane County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booker v. Perez et al
as 1:2014cv10037
Plaintiff:
Sammie Lamart Booker
Defendant:
Patrick B. Perez, C/O Ryder, C/O Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Perez et al
as 1:2014cv07519
Plaintiff:
Moses Ramirez
Defendant:
Patrick B. Perez, Kane County Adult Justice Center, Medical Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 2:2014cv00462
Petitioner:
James B. Perez
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
