Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Solis v. Hathaway et al
as 1:2011cv02937
Petitioner:
Hilda L. Solis
Respondent:
William K. Hathaway, Baltimore Behavioral Health, Inc. and BBH Retirement Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Accident Insurance Company v. Byrd et al
as 3:2011cv00367
Plaintiff:
Accident Insurance Company
Defendant:
Marcus J. Byrd, Doris P. Byrd, The Timbers Homeowners Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fairfield Sentry Limited ( In Liquidation) v. ABN AMRO Schweiz AG et al
as 1:2010cv06640
Plaintiff:
Fairfield Sentry Limited ( In Liquidation)
Defendant:
ABN AMRO Schweiz AG, Adler and Co., Privatbank AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fairfield Sentry Limited (In Liquidation) et al v. ABN AMRO Schweiz AG et al
as 1:2010cv06641
Plaintiff:
Fairfield Sentry Limited (In Liquidation) , Fairfield Sigma Limited (In Liquidation) and Fairfield Lambda Limited (In Liquidation)
Defendant:
ABN AMRO Schweiz AG, Adler & Co Privatbank AG, Allianz SPA/Unifortune Conservative Side Pocket and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Richter Cornbrooks Gribble Inc. v. BBH Design, P.A.
as 1:2009cv01711
Plaintiff:
Richter Cornbrooks Gribble Inc.
Defendant:
BBH Design, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Penaloza v. BBH, Burnnett Bayland Home and Dental Clinic
as 4:2008cv00458
Plaintiff:
Virgilio G Penaloza
Defendant:
BBH, Burnnett Bayland Home and Dental Clinic
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Santoni S.P.A. et al v. BBH, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00721
Plaintiff:
Santoni S.P.A., Santoni S.P.A., RSRJ Incorporated and others
Defendant:
BBH, Inc., BBH, Inc., BBH, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Helms v. Brandt et al
as 4:2007cv00025
Plaintiff:
Ricky Helms
Defendant:
John Brandt, Hans Brandt and BBH Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claims Related to Bankruptcy Cases
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
