Cases 31 - 40 of 209
BOWEN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
WENDY GAIL BOWEN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Beaubrun v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Thony Beaubrun
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Timothy C. Ward and Warden TOMMY BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PROGRESSIVE MOUNTAIN INSURANCE COMPANY v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv00201
Petitioner:
PROGRESSIVE MOUNTAIN INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
Justin Deion Smith, L & B Transport, LLC, Alphonza Bowens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Williams v. In The Superior Court of Troup County
as 3:2021cv00179
Petitioner:
Arsenio Cardell Williams
Respondent:
In The Superior Court of Troup County
Defendant:
Warden Tommy Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Beaubrun v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv03463
Plaintiff:
Thony Beaubrun
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Timothy C. Ward and Warden Tommy Bowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAIR v. WHITE et al
as 5:2021cv00243
Plaintiff:
TONY ANTHONY FAIR, JR
Defendant:
NURSE WHITE, MAJOR BRYANT, SERGEANT GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen et al v. AAA Staffing LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02894
Plaintiff:
Bianca Bowen and Guilouse Grandoit
Defendant:
AAA Staffing LLC and Anne O'Connell
STINSON v. BOWEN
as 4:2021cv00119
Petitioner:
MICKEY CARL STINSON
Respondent:
Warden TOMMY BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STEWART v. BOWEN et al
as 1:2021cv00117
Defendant:
CHERYL ANN FRAZIER, JUANITA THORPE, Warden TOMMY BOWEN and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
