Cases 31 - 40 of 67,683
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lomax v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Petitioner:
Nathan Louis Lomax
Respondent:
Brian Williams, NDOC and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eye-Fi Holdings, LLC et al v. Bergeson et al
as 2:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Eye-Fi Holdings, LLC and Eye-Fi, LLC
Defendant:
Brian Bergeson, Kyle Nakamoto and 3 Dots, LLC
Bechel et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03805
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Bechel, Marcia Hickson, Raven El and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hernandez v. Redd et al
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Manuel Alex Hernandez
Defendant:
Brian Redd, Bart Mortensen, Randall Honey and others
Interested Party:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Domni v. County of Nassau
as 24-1324
Plaintiff:
LEK DOMNI
Defendant:
COUNTY OF NASSAU, Police Officer CHRISTOPHER LAMONICA, Police Officer FREDERICK TRIFARO and others
US v. Brian Riggins, Jr.
as 24-6476
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BRIAN DAVID RIGGINS, JR.
Ray Blanchard v. Brian Frosh
as 24-6473
Plaintiff:
RAY A. BLANCHARD
Defendant:
BRIAN E. FROSH, MCTC WARDEN and WILLIAM BOHRER
Andrea Ratfield, et al v. United States Drug Testing Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 24-1858
Plaintiff:
ANDREA RATFIELD, ANN MARIE KELLY, BRIAN RAY and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DRUG TESTING LABORATORIES, INC., DOUGLAS LEWIS and JOSEPH JONES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
