Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Bryant-Williams et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv07129
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Bryant-Williams and Russ Williams
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv21704
Plaintiff:
Bryant Williams
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Corey Bennett v. Goowin, et al
as 14-6021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY ALAN BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
GOOWIN, Correctional Officer, CASSADAY, Cheif of Security, SHOUSE, Internal Affairs Investigator and others
Corey Bennett v. Cox, et al
as 14-6022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY ALAN BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
COX, CLEEK, DANIEL JACKSON and others
Corey Bennett v. Michael Donahue, et al
as 14-5541
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY ALAN BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL DONAHUE, Warden, BRYANT WILLIAMS, TDOC Contract Monitor, TAUSHA MITCHELL, TDOC Commissioners Designee and others
Storey v. Schofield et al
as 1:2014cv01098
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Storey
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodall, Bruce Westbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Cox et al
as 1:2014cv01091
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Cox, Cleek, Daniel Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Donahue et al
as 1:2014cv01120
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Michael Donahue, Corrections Corporation of America, Mitchell Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Goowin et al
as 1:2014cv01057
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Goowin, Cassaday, Shouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Donahue et al (TVV)
as 3:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Michael Donahue, Bryant Williams, Tausha Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
