Cases 31 - 40 of 56
ANNAMALAI v. SEIREVELD et al
as 2:2017cv00274
Plaintiff:
ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI
Defendant:
ASHOK ANNAMALAI, JOHN DOE BASKERVILLE, TODD BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WEIGLE v. McCARTHY, BURGESS & WOLFF, INC.
as 1:2017cv01874
Defendant:
McCARTHY, BURGESS & WOLFF, INC.
Plaintiff:
STEVEN WEIGLE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
OSTACK v. BURGESS
as 2:2017cv00244
Respondent:
BURGESS
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER M. OSTACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. BURGESS
as 1:2017cv00925
Defendant:
DOYLE BURGESS
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
ORANGE COUNTY INDIANA v. BURGESS & NIPLE, INC.
as 4:2016cv00230
Defendant:
BURGESS & NIPLE, INC.
Plaintiff:
ORANGE COUNTY INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
WILLIAMS et al v. ANGIE'S LIST, INC.
as 1:2016cv00878
Defendant:
ANGIE'S LIST, INC.
Plaintiff:
ROBERT AVILA, ANDREW BARTON, ERIN BURGESS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BURGESS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv00814
Plaintiff:
CAROL BURGESS
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
BURGESS v. FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 4:2016cv00025
Defendant:
OFFICER ATHERTON, JOHN/JANE DOE, FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURGESS v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2015cv00308
Defendant:
ASSOCIATE WARDENS, BOATRIGHT, BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
COREY BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
