Cases 31 - 40 of 229
Smarr v. Armor et al
as 1:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Smarr
Defendant:
Armor, Harold Clarke, Mack Bailey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farabee v. The County of Dinwiddie Virginia et al
as 2:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Brian D. Farabee
Defendant:
The County of Dinwiddie Virginia, Sheriff of Dinwiddie Virginia, Linda M.H. Tomlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Kroger Limited Partnership
as 7:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Elena Bailey
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. v. Hultgren et al
as 3:2022cv00283
Counter Defendant:
Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Carl Hultgren, Michael Bailey and Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Apex Systems, LLC v. Clements et al
as 3:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Apex Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Jeffrey L. Clements and Kedric K. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Scott v. Mullins et al
as 7:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Maurice Preston Scott
Defendant:
Sgt. Robinson, Ofc. Thompson, Ofc(s) of A&B Day & Night Shift and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey Harris v. (PWC) ADC
as 1:2021cv01182
Plaintiff:
Joshua Angelo Bailey Harris
Defendant:
(PWC) ADC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bailey et al
as 1:2021cv01161
Plaintiff:
Colton Jay Johnson
Defendant:
Mack Bailey, R. Woodson, C Haskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2021cv00110
Plaintiff:
Angela Kay Bailey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
