Cases 31 - 40 of 407
Bickham et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq02283
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bickham and Hazel Bickham
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gibson v. Bickham
as 5:2023cv00861
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
E Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leboeuf v. Bickham
as 23-30407
Petitioner / Appellant:
Rusty J. Leboeuf
Respondent / Appellee:
Edward Bickham, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute
Tackes et al v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00792
Plaintiff:
Christine Bickham, Paul Tackes and UnitedHealthcare of Wisconsin Inc
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc and ABC Insurance Company
Guardian Ad Litem:
Phenix Tackes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Jackson v. Bickham
as 23-30337
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reginald Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
Edward Bickham, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute, Daniel LaFleur, Laura Allen and others
Holden v. Bickham
as 23-30326
Petitioner / Appellant:
Eric J. Holden, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Edward Bickham, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute
Bickham v. Hooper
as 23-30280
Petitioner / Appellant:
Larry Bickham
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Lampley v. Bickham et al
as 3:2023cv00328
Petitioner:
Carlos Lampley
Respondent:
E. Dustin Bickham and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Dickerson v. Bickham
as 23-30266
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fard Abdur Rahman Dickerson, Master
Defendant / Appellee:
Edward Dustin Bickham, Warden
Johnson v. Bickham et al
as 3:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ricardo Johnson
Defendant:
E Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
