Cases 1 - 10 of 405
Woods v. Bickham
as 24-30246
Petitioner:
Allen Odell Woods
Respondent:
Edward Bickham, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute
Frickey v. Bickham
as 2:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Ryk Anthony Frickey
Defendant:
E. Dustin Bickham
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bickham v. Henderson
as 2:2024cv10525
Plaintiff:
Martez Romal Bickham
Defendant:
Michael A Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bickham v. State Appellate Defender Office et al
as 2:2024cv10503
Plaintiff:
Martez Romal Bickham
Defendant:
State Appellate Defender Office and Michael Mittlestat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nedd v. Bickham
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Bryant Nedd
Defendant:
Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bickham #777727 v. Henderson
as 2:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Martez Romal Bickham #777727
Defendant:
Michael A. Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vybe Energy, LLC v. Bickham et al
as 1:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Vybe Energy, LLC
Defendant:
Terry Bickham and Terraflux Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Bickham v. Day et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Tony D. Bickham
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Correction Probation and Parole, Travis Day and Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Trim v. Bickham et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Joseph Trim
Defendant:
Earist D. Bickham, Nurse at DCI, Doctors at DCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayman v. Bickham et al
as 2:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Hayman
Defendant:
Dustin Bickham
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
