Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Walker v. Clark et al
as 1:2017cv00298
Plaintiff:
Demario Dontez Walker
Defendant:
Jamario Clark, Jacqualine Banks, Pamela Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Holloway et al
as 1:2017cv00283
Plaintiff:
Demario D. Walker
Defendant:
Angie Holloway, Jarita Bivens, Pamela Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Lambert et al
as 1:2017cv00089
Plaintiff:
Carla Blake
Defendant:
Don Lambert and Prentiss County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blake v. State of Oklahoma, District Court of Payne County
as 5:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Andre E. W. Blake, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, District Court of Payne County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blake, Jr. v. Bradley et al
as 5:2017cv00071
Plaintiff:
Andre Eric Williams Blake, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Bradley and Gabriel Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gannon v. Kemp et al
as 2:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
Daniel Creighton Gannon
Defendant:
Todd Kemp, Mike McCara, Ben Ivy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America et al v. Jackson HMA LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00767
Plaintiff:
W. Blake Vanderlan
Defendant:
Jackson HMA LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Jackson HMA, LLC v. Vanderlan
as 3:2015cv00739
Plaintiff:
Jackson HMA, LLC
Defendant:
W. Blake Vanderlan
Third_party_defendant:
Joseph M. Still Burn Centers, Inc. and Merit Health Central-Jackson
Third_party_plaintiff:
W. Blake Vanderlan and United States of American, and the State of Mississippi ex rel, W. Blake Vanderlan, M.D.
Counter_defendant:
Jackson HMA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00055
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
United States of America v. Blakely
as 3:2015cv00063
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Clyde Blakely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
