Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Victor Etterson v. E. Boakye
as 15-1723
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR M. ETTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
E. BOAKYE, Dr., Director of Medical Dept., Riverside Regional Jail, JEFFERY NEWCOME, Superintendent, Riverside Regional Jail, WOODS, Jailer, Riverside Regional Jail and others
Osei v. Standard Chartered Bank et al
as 1:2015cv03992
Plaintiff:
Akwasi Boakye Osei
Defendant:
Standard Chartered Bank and Standard Chartered Bank Ghana Limited (Ghana)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jerome Branch v. Ms. Badgett
as 15-6667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME BRANCH
Defendant - Appellee:
MS. BADGETT, Head Nurse, MS. WHITE, RNC-A Nurse and EDWARD BOAKYE, Doctor
Boakye-Dankwa et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00352
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Boakye-Dankwa and Shaunta Moore
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Pendergast & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnson v. Boakye et al
as 3:2015cv00054
Plaintiff:
Clifton Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Boakye, Young and Stairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitzgerald v. Young et al
as 1:2015cv00087
Plaintiff:
DeWarren Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Young, Boakye and Datlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Boakye et al
as 1:2014cv01644
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Green
Defendant:
E. Boakye, Jeffery Newcome and Keys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sourdiff v. Riverside Regional Jail et al
as 2:2014cv00598
Plaintiff:
Russell M. Sourdiff, II
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail, Dr. Boakye, Nurse Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00274
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mears v. Boakye et al
as 1:2014cv01314
Plaintiff:
Colie Clarence Mears, Jr.
Defendant:
E. Boakye, I. Tarosova and Sgt. Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
