Cases 31 - 40 of 601
James McCrory et al v. Hyundai America, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
James McCrory, Tracy Miles, Brenda Smith Watson and others
Defendant:
HYUNDAI AMERICA, INC., Hyundai Motor Company, -, Kia America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Egan v. Weinreb et al
as 3:2023cv01307
Petitioner:
Michael P. Egan
Respondent:
Brad A. Weinreb and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peter Moses Gutierrez v. Amplify Energy Corporation et al
as 8:2021cv01628
Plaintiff:
Peter Moses Gutierrez, Jr., Chandralekha Wickramasekaran, Rajaskaran Wickramasekaran and others
Defendant:
Amplify Energy Corporation, Beta Operating Company, LLC, Doe Corps and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Beyond Business Incorporated d/b/a Big Fish Bait & Tackle, Charlie's Gyros, Inc., Jennifer Taylor and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Amplify Energy Corp. and SAN PEDRO BAY PIPELINE COMPANY
Cross Defendant:
Costamare Shipping Co. S.A., Cosco Beijing, Capetanissa Maritime Corporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
V. Ships Greece Ltd., V.Ships Greece Ltd., Marine Exchange of Los Angeles Long Beach Harbor doing business as Marine Exchange of Southern California and others
Special Master:
Daniel Garrie, James L. Smith and Bradley O'Brien
Petitioner:
Christopher Hamm, Randal Klein and Todd Snyder
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Markel International Insurance Company, Ltd., Ascot Underwriting Inc., QBE European Co Operations (Lloyds's Syndicate 1036) and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Certain Insurers At Lloyd's of London And London Markets Subscribing To Policy No. B0180ME2001399, Mediterranean Shipping Company, S.A., DOES 1-5 and others
Cross Claimant:
Marine Exchange of Los Angeles Long Beach Harbor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ralph T. Iannelli et al
as 2:2018cv05008
Plaintiff:
Securities & Exchange Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Ralph T Iannelli and Essex Capital Corporation
Intervenor:
TERRIE MERSHON, BILL LAWARRE, KELLEY PELLEGRI and others
Receiver:
Geoff Winkler
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Jessica Kurzban
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Marschke v. YouTube, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv06987
Plaintiff:
Brad Marschke and Nathan Colombo
Defendant:
YouTube LLC and Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Brad Accornero v. Jet Cutting Solutions, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv01151
Plaintiff:
Brad Accornero
Defendant:
Jet Cutting Solutions, Inc. and Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company v. Qwest Engineering, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02945
Defendant:
BRADLEY ALAN ZIMMERMAN, an individual also known as BRAD A. ZIMMERMAN, QWEST ENGINEERING, INC., a California corporation, BRAD A. ZIMMERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
CONSTRUCTION LABORERS TRUST FUNDS FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE COMPANY, a Delaware limited liability company and Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Brad Ward et al v. K1 Speed Franchising, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
Brad Ward, SWF1, LLC and SWF1 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
K1 Speed Franchising, Inc., David Danglard, Josh Boxer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Restivo v. COGSWELL COLLEGE, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv01548
Plaintiff:
Charles Restivo
Defendant:
COGSWELL COLLEGE, LLC, Brad Palmer, PALM VENTURES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Eric Bjorklund v. County of Santa Barbara et al
as 2:2023cv02140
Plaintiff:
Eric Bjorklund
Defendant:
County of Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Offc, Brad Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
