Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 5:2016cv00117
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Hale
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Correction Academy, Treatment Correction Academy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 0:2016cv61648
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Hale
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Southwest University, Brigham Young University and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Brigham Young University et al
as 1:2016cv01732
Plaintiff:
Larry Carr
Defendant:
Brigham Young University, Western Athletic Conference and National Collegiate Athletic Association, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chambers v. A.B. "Sug" Robertson et al
as 6:2016cv00925
Plaintiff:
Randell Chambers
Defendant:
A.B. "Sug" Robertson, Brigham Young, Lawton & Geronimo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. A.B. "Sug" Robertson et al
as 1:2016cv03509
Plaintiff:
Randell Chambers
Defendant:
A.B. "Sug" Robertson, Brigham Young, Lawton & Geronimo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SACKOS v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2014cv01710
Defendant:
ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY, ALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY, ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY and others
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA SACKOS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Selvin Cunningham v. Brigham Young
as 14-4006
Petitioner - Appellant:
SELVIN R. CUNNINGHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIGHAM YOUNG
Hajicek v. Heperi et al
as 2:2014cv00640
Plaintiff:
Samantha R. Hajicek
Defendant:
Vernon Heperi, Glory Drake, Lacey Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05194
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Beus Gilbert PLLC v. Robertson et al
as 2:2014cv00206
Plaintiff:
Beus Gilbert PLLC
Defendant:
Donald Robertson, Brigham Young University, Weilin Xie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
