Cases 31 - 40 of 145
McGuire-Mollica v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The et al
as 7:2020cv01768
Defendant:
Chad Garrett, Medley, Shoulders and others
Plaintiff:
Terri McGuire-Mollica
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01717
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Ms Shoulders, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and others
Petitioner:
Shareka Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bridges v. Warden et al
as 7:2020cv01646
Plaintiff:
Comulus L Bridges
Defendant:
Warden, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Governor of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Votrobek v. Sanders et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00823
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, David Brewer, Jeffrey Keller and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Votrobek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kannell v. Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2020cv01575
Plaintiff:
Anja K Kannell
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flippo v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01510
Defendant:
Chad Garrett, Mr Brown and The Medical and Health Staff
Plaintiff:
Dana Flippo
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons and Isaac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rand v. Sanders et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00783
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, David Brewer, Jeffrey Keller and others
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Rand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayden v. Garrett
as 7:2020cv01405
Respondent:
Chad Garrett
Petitioner:
Opal Hayden
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons and Unit Team Isaac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alexander v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01192
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Patricia Bradley and Katina Heckard
Petitioner:
Betty Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
English v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01141
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Ms. Bell and others
Petitioner:
Tanya L. English
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
