Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Rogers v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2016ct03334
Plaintiff: Michael Orlando Rogers
Defendant: Unnamed Defendant, Sgt. Daughtry, Sergeant Marker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bynum v. USA
as 5:2016cv00505
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Ephriam Bynum, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bynum v. Lincoln County Animal Services We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00081
Plaintiff: Jonathan Bynum
Defendant: Lincoln County Animal Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bynum v. Pine View Building We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00082
Plaintiff: Jonathan Bynum
Defendant: Pine View Building
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Bynum v. Smith, Debnam et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00080
Plaintiff: Jonathan Bynum
Defendant: Smith, Debnam and Jeff D. Rogers
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Bynum v. United States Postal Service We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00076
Plaintiff: Jonathan Bynum
Defendant: United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bynum v. Lincoln County Clerk of Court We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00079
Plaintiff: Jonathan Bynum
Defendant: Lincoln County Clerk of Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00077
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bynum v. BB&T Bank We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00027
Plaintiff: Jonathan Bynum
Defendant: BB&T Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYNUM v. USA
as 1:2016cv00043
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: KINYAN CORTEZ BYNUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?