Cases 31 - 40 of 180
Lornes v. Johnson, et al
as 22-1393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM L. LORNES, III
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNSON, WHITE, DONALD NUNEZ and others
Rhame v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2022cv02518
Plaintiff:
Liza Rhame
Defendant:
State of Colorado, SE CDOC Parole-Op, El Paso County, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Long, et al
as 22-1207
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT EDWARD HILL
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFF LONG, Warden, SCF, DEAN WILLIAMS, Executive Director CDOC and PHILIP J. WEISER, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Allen v. Executive Director of CDOC et al
as 1:2021cv03151
Plaintiff:
Edward Allen
Defendant:
Executive Director of CDOC, Warden of CTCF and Crain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vreeland v. Olson, et al
as 21-1364
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Defendant / Appellee:
MAJOR JAMES OLSON, CDOC/AVCF, MAJOR SCOTT GROVER, CDOC/AVCF, CASE MANAGER MS. REED, CDOC/AVCF and others
Grey v. Polis et al
as 1:2021cv02620
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Grey and Christopher J. Kitrin
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Dean Williams, Leonard Woodson III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grey v. Polis et al
as 1:2021cv02622
Petitioner:
Christopher J. Grey and Christopher J. Kitrin
Respondent:
Jared Polis, Dean Williams, Caley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lornes v. People, The/CDOC et al
as 1:2021cv02288
Plaintiff:
William Lee Lornes
Defendant:
People, The/CDOC and People of State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oakley v. Williams et al
as 1:2021cv01763
Plaintiff:
Jacob D. Oakley
Defendant:
Offender Accounts, CDOC Assigned Controler of the State, Dean Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vreeland v. Polis et al
as 1:2021cv01684
Defendant:
Scott Dauffenbach, Adrienne Jacobson-Sanchez, CDOC Central Classification Supervisor and others
Plaintiff:
Delmart Vreeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
