Cases 31 - 40 of 81
USA v. Charles Horton
as 12-14215
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES HORTON
USA v. Charles Horton
as 12-13031
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES HORTON, Charlie Horton
Horton v. Robert A. Deyton Detention
as 1:2012cv00941
Petitioner:
Charles Horton
Respondent:
Robert A. Deyton Detention
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Walker et al v. Jefferson County Board of Education
as 2:2010cv02713
Plaintiff:
Darryl Walker , Charles Horton , Kimberly B Ryan and others
Defendant:
Jefferson County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Horton et al v. Townhomes, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv01302
Plaintiff:
Charles Horton and Tammy Woulard
Defendant:
Townhomes, LLC and CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HORTON et al v. AC&S, INC., et al
as 2:2010cv63564
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HORTON and WANDO HORTON
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HORTON et al v. AC&S, INC., et al
as 2:2010cv63587
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HORTON and WANDO HORTON
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HORTON et al v. AC&S, INC., et al
as 2:2010cv63567
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HORTON and WANDO HORTON
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HORTON et al v. AC&S, INC., et al
as 2:2010cv63602
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HORTON and WANDO HORTON
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HORTON et al v. AC&S, INC., et al
as 2:2010cv63574
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HORTON and WANDO HORTON
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
