Cases 1 - 10 of 81
USA v. Charles Horton
as 22-14220
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES HORTON
Horton v. Mattinez
as 2:2022cv06126
Plaintiff:
Charles Horton
Defendant:
Filipe Mattinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Opes Capital Fund I, LP et al v. Evolution Sports LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03823
Defendant:
Evolution Sports LLC, Revolution Sports Agency LLC and Damarius Bilbo
Plaintiff:
Opes Capital Fund I, LP, Worth Financial Advisory Group, LLC doing business as Worth Advisors, Worth Financial Tax Services, LLC doing business as Worth Tax Advisors and others
Counter Defendant:
Worth Financial Advisory Group, LLC and Worth Financial Tax Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Charles HortonIn re: Charles Horton
as 22-11655
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES HORTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Horton v. Clark et al
as 4:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Charles Horton
Defendant:
Clark, Hill, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Charles Horton
as 21-14464
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES HORTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Charles Horton
as 21-14475
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES HORTON, a.k.a. Charlie Horton
Horton et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2021cv00149
Plaintiff:
Charles Horton and Cathy Horton
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Horton v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv04378
Petitioner:
Charles Horton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HORTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv24227
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HORTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
