Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 10,869
Hurley v. TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00155
Petitioner: Freddy Hurley
Respondent: Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00158
Petitioner: Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Director
as 5:2024cv00064
Petitioner: Reidie Jackson
Respondent: TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kindred v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00219
Petitioner: Herman Lee Kindred
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. TDCJ
as 3:2024cv01038
Petitioner: MonQuas Barnes
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00218
Petitioner: Douglas Ray Evans
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Del Cid-Morales v. Garland
as 24-60205
Petitioner: Maria Fernanda Del Cid-Morales, Saira Aracely Del Cid-Morales and Angel Rodrigo Del Cid-Morales
Respondent: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
McCoy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00985
Petitioner: James McCoy
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cid v. Gillespie et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv02377
Plaintiff: Jamie Cid
Defendant: Gillespie and Falfal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosher v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner: Daniel Emmett Mosher
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?