Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Immigration: Review of Denial of Naturalization Application
Katta v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2021cv00022
Defendant:
Homeland Security, Department of, US Citizenship and Immigration Services and US Attorney General
Plaintiff:
James Wotto Katta
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1421
Katta v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 4:2021cv00045
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, Homeland Security, Department of and US Citizenship and Immigration Services
Plaintiff:
James Wotto Katta
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1421
Ismail v. United States Department of State et al
as 3:2019cv00084
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, United States Department of State and others
Plaintiff:
Laila Ismail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv02036
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01027
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00359
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00045
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00048
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
