Cases 31 - 39 of 39
SIESTA v. CAMARDA
as 2:2013cv07510
Respondent:
JEFFREY M. CAMARDA and KIMBERLY K. CAMARDA
Petitioner:
MARTIN SIESTA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Camarada et al v. Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, Inc.
as 8:2013mc00103
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Camarda and Kimberly K. Camarda
Defendant:
Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, Inc.
Movant:
V. Raymond Ferrara
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Camarda v. Alwaysonvacation, Inc.
as 3:2013cv04265
Plaintiff:
Jarrett Camarda
Defendant:
Alwaysonvacation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Arch Insurance Company et al
as 1:2013cv04433
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Arch Insurance Company and Vincent Camarda
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
CAMARDA et al v. CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER BOARD OF STANDARDS, INC.
as 1:2013cv00871
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY M. CAMARDA and KIMBERLY K. CAMARDA
Defendant:
CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER BOARD OF STANDARDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Camarda v. Alwaysonvacation, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01127
Plaintiff:
Jarrett Camarda
Defendant:
Alwaysonvacation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States Of America for the use of C.T.W. Electrical Corp. et al v. Arch Insurance Company et al
as 1:2013cv01404
Plaintiff:
United States Of America for the use of C.T.W. Electrical Corp. and Sirina Protection Systems Corp.
Defendant:
Arch Insurance Company and Vincent Camarda
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith et al v. Spencer et al
as 1:2007cv00860
Plaintiff:
Tamara Smith, Wayne Smith and George Denton
Defendant:
Tyrone Spencer, Marc Martinez, Badge No. S712, Francisco Soria, Badge No. SR15 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
