Cases 31 - 40 of 151
Campbell v. United States of America
as 0:2020cv00486
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Comfort Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Campbell v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv00169
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
William Campbell
Campbell v. Hartford Life and Accidental Insurance Company, The
as 0:2019cv03169
Plaintiff:
George Campbell
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accidental Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Camp v. City of Dayton et al
as 0:2019cv02806
Plaintiff:
Matthew Campbell and Matthew Camp
Defendant:
City of Dayton, Officer Brant Standridge and Police Chief Paul Enga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Campbell v. Choi et al
as 0:2019cv02671
Respondent:
Judge Sara Grewing, Adam Bailey, John Choi and others
Petitioner:
James Paul Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edner v. Redwood County District Attorney's Office et al
as 0:2019cv02486
Defendant:
Attorney Megan Burkehammer, Redwood Count - State of Minnesota Board of Public Defenders, Joel Solie and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan C. Edner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edner v. Redwood County District Attorney's Office et al
as 0:2019cv02485
Defendant:
Attorney Megan Burkehammer, Joel Solie, Mike Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Edner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Park State Bank v. Duluth Steel Fabricators, Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv02438
Defendant:
Gleason Construction, Inc., Mark W. Youngren, Bougalis Construction, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Park State Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Grimm et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02246
Plaintiff:
Justin Spaunhorst, Daniel Flanagan, Matthew Cowell and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Crittenden et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02220
Plaintiff:
Christopher Raney, Michael Whiddon, Donald Jones and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
