Cases 31 - 40 of 88
Currie v. Andrews et al
as 2:2016cv14153
Plaintiff:
Marlon Currie
Defendant:
Thomas Andrews, Michigan, State of, United States of America and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv13564
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carr v. Hansberry et al
as 2:2016cv10678
Plaintiff:
Thomas Carr
Defendant:
David Hansberry, Andre Rupert , Bryan Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ACE Telephone Company of Michigan, Inc. et al v. Level 3 Communications, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
ACE Telephone Company of Michigan, Inc. , Allendale Telephone Company , Baraga Telephone Company and others
Defendant:
Level 3 Communications, LLC , Wiltel Communications, LLC and Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0251
Hardy #159525 v. Sizer et al
as 2:2015cv00135
Plaintiff:
David Hardy #159525
Defendant:
Matthew Sizer, Russell DeFreitas, Dawn Eicher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fogg Filler Company v. Kaba Ilco Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv01193
Plaintiff:
Fogg Filler Company
Defendant:
Kaba Ilco Corporation and McMaster-Carr Supply Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Sprint Communications Company, LP v. ACE Telephone Company of Michigan, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00565
Plaintiff:
Sprint Communications Company, LP
Defendant:
ACE Telephone Company of Michigan, Inc., Allendale Telephone Company, Drenthe Telephone Company and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00493
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
