Cases 31 - 40 of 155
Jones v. Spangler et al
as 3:2022cv00700
Plaintiff:
Danny J. Jones
Defendant:
Jerry Spangler, Jim Casey and Christopher Hugan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Caseys General Stores, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01166
Plaintiff:
Beverly Lewis
Defendant:
Caseys General Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Casey v. R. T. Carlock Company
as 2:2022cv02468
Plaintiff:
Charles E Casey
Defendant:
R. T. Carlock Company
Whitson v. Cumberland County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Janice Whitson
Defendant:
Cumberland County Jail, Dr. Grace, Mandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitson v. Cumberland County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Janice Whitson
Defendant:
Cumberland County Jail, Dr. Grace, Nurse Mandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shirley v. Simms et al
as 3:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Thomas Shirley
Defendant:
Amanda Simms, Michael Parris, Dr. Emily Olroid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burger v. Polk County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jillian Burger
Defendant:
Polk County, Tennessee, Mark Von Roden, Stacy Weed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shirley v. Simms et al
as 3:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Thomas Shirley
Defendant:
Dr. Amanda Simms, Michael Parris, Dr. Emily Olroid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rolston et al v. Robinson-Coffee et al
as 3:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Robert Rolston and Catherine R. Dunlap-Rolston
Defendant:
Tracey Robinson-Coffee, Dianne Turner, Estate of William Faimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Murray v. Chan's Frame and Body Shop, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00033
Plaintiff:
Dylan Murray
Defendant:
Chan's Frame and Body Shop, LLC, John Mark Roberts, Casey Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
