Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Banks et al v. FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound et al
as 1:2011cv01095
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound, Dougless Williams, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Frederick Banks v. Sager, et al
as 11-2153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SAGER, Ft. Dix, R & D Officer, R&D DEPT, FORT DIX FCI and others
Frederick Banks v. A. Whitaker, et al
as 11-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
A WHITAKER, Teacher, J TENOR, Education Supervisor, B STEELE, Teacher and others
Banks v. Sager et al
as 1:2011cv00741
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
S. Sager, R & D Department, Fort Dix, NJ CFCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2011cv00669
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
A. Whitaker, Stevens, J. Tenor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perales v. U. S. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2010cv02621
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
U. S. Internal Revenue Service, U. S. Department of Labor, Hilda L. Solis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
De Masi v. Schumer
as 1:2010cv03428
Plaintiff:
Douglas D. De Masi, Sr.
Defendant:
Charles E. Schumer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
De Masi v. Schumer
as 7:2010cv03428
Plaintiff:
Douglas D. De Masi, Sr.
Defendant:
Charles E. Schumer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Frederick Banks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 09-5146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Defendant - Appellee:
Harley G. Lappin, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General and others
Winningham v. Wake et al
as 7:2009cv02271
Defendant:
Neil V. Wake, John M. Roll, Randy Ely and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Winningham
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
