Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Allied Construction Industries v. City Of Cincinnati
as 1:2014cv00450
Plaintiff:
Allied Construction Industries
Defendant:
Cincinnati, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohammad-Yahya Dweidary v. Cincinnati, City of et al
as 1:2013cv00911
Plaintiff:
Mohammad-Muawyeh Mohammad-Yahya Dweidary
Defendant:
Cincinnati, City of and Immigration and Nationalization
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Vieh v. Smythe et al
as 1:2013cv00877
Plaintiff:
Sebastien Vieh
Defendant:
Andrea Smythe, Shawn George, Cincinnati City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gustavson v. Cincinnati City of et al
as 1:2013cv00717
Plaintiff:
William M. Gustavson
Defendant:
Cincinnati City of , Board of Trustees Cincinnati Retirement System , Christopher Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Lawson et al
as 1:2013cv00652
Plaintiff:
Charles Chapman
Defendant:
Steven Lawson, Agents of Regional Narcotics Unit and Organized Crime Divison, Mark Tiereny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kahles et al v. City Of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2013cv00560
Plaintiff:
Regina Kahles and Ronald Bear
Defendant:
Cincinnati City of and Cincinnati Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Karim v. Sanders et al
as 1:2013cv00540
Plaintiff:
Sharmia Karim
Defendant:
Lenzie Lamont Sanders, Adrian Miller , Carlos Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thomer v. Cincinnati City of et al
as 1:2013cv00340
Plaintiff:
John Forest Thomer, II
Defendant:
Cincinnati City of, Officer Daniel Kreider and Officer Ron Hugley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
