Cases 31 - 40 of 542
Centripetal Networks, LLC v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
as 23-2027
Appellant:
CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, LLC
Appellee:
PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC., CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. and KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
TFORCE FREIGHT, INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2023cv03263
Plaintiff:
TFORCE FREIGHT, INC.
Defendant:
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
WiFi Rail, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00662
Plaintiff:
WiFi Rail, Inc.
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
InfoExpress Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 4:2023cv02698
Plaintiff:
InfoExpress Inc.
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Video Solutions Pte. Ltd. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Video Solutions Pte. Ltd.
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Speech Transcription, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Speech Transcription, LLC
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Lionra Technologies Ltd. v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Lionra Technologies Ltd.
Defendant:
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
Fortinet, Inc. and Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Lionra Technologies Ltd. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Lionra Technologies Ltd.
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
as 23-1809
Appellant:
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
Appellee:
VIRNETX INC.
Cisco Systems, Inc., et al v. Wilson Chung, et al
as 23-15590
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation and CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC., a California corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
WILSON CHUNG and PLANTRONICS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant:
JAMES HE, JEDD WILLIAMS and THOMAS PUORRO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
