Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Cobb v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00161
Plaintiff:
Oscar Vann Cobb
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cobb v. Keen Mountain Correctional Center VA DOC
as 3:2015cv00214
Plaintiff:
Deon C. Cobb
Respondent:
Keen Mountain Correctional Center VA DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brandveen v. Litton et al
as 3:2013cv00243
Plaintiff:
Roberto E. Brandveen
Defendant:
Larry B. Litton, Litton Loan Servicing, April Carlisle and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Bey v. Commonwealth et al
as 1:2013cv00176
Defendant:
Commonwealth, PWC Adult Detention Center, Tracy Calvin Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Akil Rashidi Bey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Cobb v. Sheriff, Chesapeake City Jail et al
as 3:2012cv00794
Petitioner:
Deon Cobb
Respondent:
Sheriff, Chesapeake City Jail and Director, VDOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cobbs v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv00790
Plaintiff:
John Lee Cobbs
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Cobb v. Director VDOC et al
as 3:2012cv00785
Plaintiff:
Deon Cobb
Defendant:
Director VDOC, Sheriff, Chesapeake City Jail, Mott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobbs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2012cv00011
Plaintiff:
Diana W. Cobbs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mathis v. Wang et al
as 7:2011cv00271
Defendant:
Dr. Bob Behnke, Ms. K. Carter, Ms. J. Cobbs and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne K. Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
