Cases 31 - 40 of 242
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2022cv00313
Defendant:
JARED MYNATT, DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLE v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv01209
Petitioner:
RICHARD COLE
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cole v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
Malik Juwan Cole
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Wexford of Indiana, Gordon Ball and others
Not Classified By Court:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
WILLIAMS v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
CAMERON T. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, DAVID ARCHER, COLE BANTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLE v. WARDEN
as 3:2022cv00046
Petitioner:
JONATHAN P. COLE
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARES v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00723
Plaintiff:
JORGE MARES
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, W. KNIGHT, COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Christopher G Lewis
Defendant:
William Hyatte, Mary Lassiter, Jacqueline Scaife and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Eric Holcomb, Suzanne Crouch, Holli Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
