Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Stalk v. Stirling et al
as 1:2021cv00932
Defendant: Sam Ray, Marquita McCullough, Colie L Rushton and others
Plaintiff: David D Stalk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesbit, Jr. v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv00960
Defendant: Sam Ray, Kenneth Sharp, Mark Bethea and others
Plaintiff: Henry Nesbit, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv00961
Defendant: Marilyn Williams, Sequawna Rogers, Jamal Clavon and others
Plaintiff: Janice Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv00962
Defendant: Lucretia Mack, Marilyn Williams, Colie L. Rushton and others
Plaintiff: Yvette Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
German v. Stirling et al
as 9:2021cv00634
Defendant: William Burley III, Sam Ray, Kenneth Sharp and others
Plaintiff: JaKobe German
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv00632
Plaintiff: Chancellor Deshawn Montgomery
Defendant: Sam Ray, C/O Jackson, Kenneth Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Stirling et al
as 6:2021cv00633
Defendant: William Burley III, Sam Ray, Kenneth Sharp and others
Plaintiff: Quinteris Z. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booker v. Haley et al
as 2:2015cv04303
Plaintiff: Patrick L Booker
Defendant: Nikki R Haley, Brian P Stirling, Dennis Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Harvin v. Colie Rushton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-7384
Petitioner - Appellant: LARRY G. HARVIN
Respondent - Appellee: COLIE L. RUSHTON and HENRY MCMASTER
Anthony Kelly v. South Carolina Department of C We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-6465
Petitioner - Appellant: ANTHONY TYRONE KELLY, a/k/a Anthony T. Kelley
Respondent - Appellee: SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COLIE L. RUSHTON, Warden of McCormick Correctional Institution and HENRY MCMASTER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?